Steinberg got rid of the NEK, dropped upgrades to $200, and seem to have at least somewhat closed the gap between releases. So all-in-all I’m not really convinced that this is a big deal or even one with a reasonable and easy solution. It could very well be that doing it in some other ways actually adds development time to the process… and time is money so that’s less revenue for Steinberg which guaranteed will trickle down as a relatively higher cost for us customers. Lastly, all of this also assumes that the current way Steinberg have structured their workforce makes all of this efficient. not to mention that Cubase users will complain that they’ll pay for the music features and we don’t.

And if it’s indeed possible to split the features into music/post in terms of integrating them into Nuendo we actually wouldn’t even get stuff sooner, just Cubase users would get their stuff later… and then we’d get more stuff (post).Īnd when you do that you also have to consider pricing ‘optics’ are we going to pay twice - once for the earlier music features and again later for the post features, or are our music features going to look as if they’re “free” and then the post features are going to look more expensive by comparison?. Just saying we should get the new features first means Cubase users have to wait for a purely artificial reason they paid less.

ADR Taker 2.I think there’s a limited amount of options when it comes to releasing these two softwares, and some of them don’t really make sense.

Professional bass management including several routing and filter options coming with the new Bass Manager plug-in.Automated Loudness processing to both industry standards such as EBU R128 and fully user-definable settings.

Nuendo 10.5